STNC vs. GARY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

STNC vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.28% return.

STNC

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 19.53%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: -4.30%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 25.28%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNC vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	7.97%	-0.81%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	25.28%	0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and GARY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

STNC vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC

STNC Risk / Return Rank: 47
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STNC	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STNC	GARY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	3.28	-2.78

Drawdowns

STNC vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	STNC	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-10.28%	-12.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-4.86%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-1.70%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STNC	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	20.25%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	20.25%	-4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.40%	20.25%	-4.85%

STNC vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

STNC vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.96%	0.08%	0.58%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STNC and GARY in my portfolio?

STNC and GARY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STNC or GARY?

On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STNC or GARY?

GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STNC or GARY?

STNC has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between STNC and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.77% for GARY.