STNC vs. CMDT
STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - STNC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Red Gate Advisers LLC, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. STNC is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STNC returned 13.47%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
STNC vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with STNC having a 13.06% return and CMDT slightly higher at 13.43%.
STNC
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CMDT
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STNC vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 13.06% | 10.33% | 8.92% | 7.31% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 13.43% | 12.78% | 6.93% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between STNC and CMDT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between STNC and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STNC vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
STNC
CMDT
STNC vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STNC | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.93 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 9.62 | +1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STNC vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNC | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -11.11% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -11.11% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -11.11% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -11.11% | +9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -2.77% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.25% | +0.10% |
Volatility
STNC vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 3.26%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STNC | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 3.26% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 10.60% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 12.65% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 12.24% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 12.24% | +3.24% |
STNC vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
STNC vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than CMDT's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.67% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF | 0.90% | 1.02% | 0.96% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STNC and CMDT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STNC has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to CMDT (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs CMDT's -11.11%.
On 3-year performance, STNC leads with 13.47% vs 12.77% for CMDT. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STNC has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.
CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.90% for STNC.
STNC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.65% for CMDT.
STNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STNC and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer