PortfoliosLab logo
CMDT vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CMDT and DBMF is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CMDT vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMDT:

0.02

DBMF:

-1.07

Sortino Ratio

CMDT:

0.60

DBMF:

-1.31

Omega Ratio

CMDT:

1.09

DBMF:

0.83

Calmar Ratio

CMDT:

0.02

DBMF:

-0.61

Martin Ratio

CMDT:

0.09

DBMF:

-1.02

Ulcer Index

CMDT:

11.76%

DBMF:

9.91%

Daily Std Dev

CMDT:

75.49%

DBMF:

9.91%

Max Drawdown

CMDT:

-60.09%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

CMDT:

-46.72%

DBMF:

-14.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDT achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's -2.84% return.


CMDT

YTD

0.26%

1M

2.42%

6M

-3.21%

1Y

1.24%

3Y*

-6.99%

5Y*

-4.25%

10Y*

-3.38%

DBMF

YTD

-2.84%

1M

0.52%

6M

-3.04%

1Y

-10.54%

3Y*

-1.94%

5Y*

5.45%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMDT vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMDT vs. DBMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMDT is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMDT is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMDT is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMDT is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMDT vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDT and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMDT vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than DBMF's 6.04% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
8.22%8.45%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.04%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

CMDT vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDT drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDT and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMDT vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a higher volatility of 28.40% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 1.86%. This indicates that CMDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...