STNC vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STNC (Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. STNC is actively managed, while BIBL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STNC returned 7.71%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for BIBL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STNC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

STNC vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNC achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 23.84% return.

STNC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 6M: 22.77%
• 1Y: 40.34%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNC vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	9.57%	10.33%	8.92%	11.49%	-13.10%	17.77%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	23.84%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between STNC and BIBL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021	0.86

The correlation between STNC and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

STNC vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STNC	BIBL
Consumer Cyclical	19.9%	0.3%
Technology	19.9%	30.1%
Healthcare	13.8%	4.3%
Industrials	12.0%	26.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	0.5%
Communication Services	7.9%	-
Financial Services	6.3%	8.3%
Utilities	4.8%	3.5%
Basic Materials	4.1%	4.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	14.7%
Energy	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

STNC vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNC

STNC Risk / Return Rank: 47
STNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
STNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
STNC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
STNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
STNC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 81
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNC vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STNC	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.62	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.53	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.45	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	4.53	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	19.63	-10.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STNC vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNC and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STNC	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.62	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.52	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.63	-0.10

Drawdowns

STNC vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNC and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	STNC	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-36.12%	+13.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.09%	-8.94%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.90%	-20.60%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	-30.85%	+8.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	0.00%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-7.04%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.06%	+0.28%

Volatility

STNC vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF (STNC) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 4.62%. This indicates that STNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STNC	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	4.62%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	12.63%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	15.47%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.53%	19.59%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	21.08%	-5.69%

STNC vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

STNC vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

STNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than BIBL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
STNC Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.96%	0.08%	0.58%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STNC and BIBL in my portfolio?

STNC and BIBL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STNC or BIBL?

STNC has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to BIBL (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNC dropped -22.33% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, STNC or BIBL?

On 5-year performance, BIBL leads with 10.11% vs 7.71% for STNC. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BIBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STNC or BIBL?

Over the 5-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STNC or BIBL?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for STNC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STNC or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.93% for STNC.

What is the main difference between STNC and BIBL?

They also come from different issuers: Red Gate Advisers LLC and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for STNC and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.