STM vs. BG
STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) and BG (Bunge Limited) are both stocks. STM operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while BG operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, STM returned 23.44%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for BG. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STM vs. BG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 102.77% return, which is significantly higher than BG's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has outperformed BG with an annualized return of 23.44%, while BG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.
STM
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -25.92%
- 6M
- 88.59%
- YTD
- 102.77%
- 1Y
- 108.20%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
BG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $168.20M | $156.93M | $196.43M | |
| $760.73M | $779.02M | $847.43M |
STM vs. BG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 102.77% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
BG Bunge Limited | 20.66% | 18.56% | -20.74% | 3.79% | 9.28% | 46.77% | 18.92% | 11.77% | -17.99% | -4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between STM and BG is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STM and BG has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
STM:
$46.76B
BG:
$20.41B
STM:
$0.49
BG:
$5.15
STM:
106.24
BG:
20.65
STM:
3.78
BG:
0.23
STM:
2.76
BG:
1.31
STM:
$13.08B
BG:
$91.82B
STM:
$4.49B
BG:
$4.54B
STM:
$2.21B
BG:
$2.51B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STM vs. BG — Risk / Return Rank
STM
BG
STM vs. BG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Bunge Limited (BG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STM | BG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.84 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 5.72 | +3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STM vs. BG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than BG's maximum drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and BG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STM | BG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -77.34% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.41% | -20.18% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.26% | -38.82% | -26.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.66% | -41.49% | -25.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.66% | -60.49% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.36% | -19.16% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -28.79% | -26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.85% | 6.47% | +5.38% |
Volatility
STM vs. BG - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a higher volatility of 28.39% compared to Bunge Limited (BG) at 12.25%. This indicates that STM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STM | BG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.39% | 12.25% | +16.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.19% | 22.14% | +29.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.10% | 31.79% | +27.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.04% | 29.58% | +17.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.13% | 31.10% | +14.03% |
Dividends
STM vs. BG - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BG's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 2.65% | 3.12% | 3.48% | 2.55% | 2.31% | 2.76% | 3.05% | 3.48% | 3.59% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.69% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
STM vs. BG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Bunge Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STM vs. BG - Profitability Comparison
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
BG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 24.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.0%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
BG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 222.00M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
BG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 678.00M and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STM and BG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (28.39%) compared to BG (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STM dropped -94.40% vs BG's -77.34%.
STM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STM and BG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer