STLG vs. SGRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT).

STLG and SGRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020.

Performance

STLG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STLG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	-6.01%	11.68%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	6.68%	25.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 6.68% return.

STLG

• 1D: 3.86%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: -6.01%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: -8.35%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 6M: 13.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

SGRT

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

STLG

iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF

Return for Risk

STLG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLG

STLG Risk / Return Rank: 67
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STLG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STLG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.89	-1.17

Correlation

The correlation between STLG and SGRT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

STLG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than SGRT's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF	0.32%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

STLG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	STLG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-17.87%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.35%	-9.53%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-3.50%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STLG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.39%	32.55%	-8.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.86%	32.55%	-10.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	32.55%	-8.53%