PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLG vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STLG vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.


STLG

1D
-0.72%
1M
11.92%
YTD
21.29%
6M
21.80%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLG vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
21.29%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between STLG and DLN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.69

The correlation between STLG and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STLG vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STLG
DLN

Technology

54.2%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.7%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.6%

Communication Services

6.3%
7.8%

Industrials

5.7%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
9.3%

Financial Services

2.2%
18.0%

Utilities

1.6%
5.9%

Energy

1.1%
8.5%

Basic Materials

0.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
4.0%

Technology

STLG
54.2%
DLN
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

STLG
16.7%
DLN
5.0%

Healthcare

STLG
8.8%
DLN
12.6%

Communication Services

STLG
6.3%
DLN
7.8%

Industrials

STLG
5.7%
DLN
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

STLG
3.0%
DLN
9.3%

Financial Services

STLG
2.2%
DLN
18.0%

Utilities

STLG
1.6%
DLN
5.9%

Energy

STLG
1.1%
DLN
8.5%

Basic Materials

STLG
0.2%
DLN
1.0%

Real Estate

STLG
0.0%
DLN
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLG vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLG
STLG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLG vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STLGDLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.53

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

3.64

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.69

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.85

15.59

-2.74

STLG vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLG and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STLGDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.93

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.53

+0.36

Drawdowns

STLG vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLGDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-57.84%

+26.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-6.10%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-13.71%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-16.26%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.51%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-7.52%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.44%

+1.96%

Volatility

STLG vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLGDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

2.17%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

6.77%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

8.87%

+9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

13.26%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

16.16%

+7.73%

STLG vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

STLG vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STLG and DLN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 20.26% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, STLG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STLG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.25% for STLG.

STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLG and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer