PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLD vs. INGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STLD vs. INGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLD achieves a 67.39% return, which is significantly higher than INGR's -6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, STLD has outperformed INGR with an annualized return of 29.92%, while INGR has yielded a comparatively lower 0.79% annualized return.


STLD

1D
1.15%
1M
23.29%
YTD
67.39%
6M
65.42%
1Y
114.70%
3Y*
40.23%
5Y*
36.27%
10Y*
29.92%

INGR

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-8.29%
1Y
-24.48%
3Y*
0.77%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLD vs. INGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
67.39%50.70%-1.99%22.75%60.14%71.42%12.46%16.78%-29.02%23.34%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
-6.49%-17.86%29.22%14.08%4.47%26.35%-12.55%4.70%-33.10%13.87%

Correlation

The correlation between STLD and INGR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1997

0.33

The correlation between STLD and INGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

STLD:

$9.33

INGR:

$13.96

PE Ratio

STLD:

30.30

INGR:

7.28

PS Ratio

STLD:

2.19

INGR:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

STLD:

$19.01B

INGR:

$5.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STLD:

$2.66B

INGR:

$1.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

STLD:

$2.23B

INGR:

$902.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLD vs. INGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLD
STLD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
STLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

INGR
INGR Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INGR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INGR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLD vs. INGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STLDINGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.75

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

-0.95

+6.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.49

-1.58

+21.07

STLD vs. INGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the INGR Sharpe Ratio of -1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLD and INGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STLD vs. INGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLD drawdown since its inception was -87.05%, which is greater than INGR's maximum drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLD and INGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLDINGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.05%

-64.20%

-22.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.33%

-26.58%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.66%

-33.21%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.20%

-33.21%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.46%

-56.14%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.78%

+31.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.27%

-18.32%

-14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

16.03%

-9.99%

Volatility

STLD vs. INGR - Volatility Comparison

Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) at 5.82%. This indicates that STLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLDINGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

5.82%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

11.73%

+13.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.38%

16.64%

+16.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.03%

21.32%

+16.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.31%

24.87%

+14.44%

Dividends

STLD vs. INGR - Dividend Comparison

STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than INGR's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
3.21%2.92%1.72%2.75%2.78%2.67%3.23%2.70%2.68%1.57%1.52%1.82%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
0.72%1.18%1.61%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.08%

Financials

STLD vs. INGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Ingredion Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.20B
0
(STLD) Total Revenue
(INGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


STLD and INGR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STLD has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to INGR (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLD dropped -87.05% vs INGR's -64.20%.

STLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLD and INGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer