STK vs. ADVDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX).
STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009. ADVDX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Sep 21, 2003.
Performance
STK vs. ADVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STK vs. ADVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 4.31% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | -1.55% | 20.33% | 7.74% | 13.35% | -13.36% | 16.80% | 10.33% | 25.43% | -9.57% | 23.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than ADVDX's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, STK has outperformed ADVDX with an annualized return of 19.03%, while ADVDX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.
STK
- 1D
- 5.54%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 46.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
ADVDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STK vs. ADVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STK has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ADVDX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STK vs. ADVDX — Risk / Return Rank
STK
ADVDX
STK vs. ADVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STK | ADVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.20 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 1.71 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.51 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 6.90 | +5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STK | ADVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.20 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.59 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.35 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between STK and ADVDX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
STK vs. ADVDX - Dividend Comparison
STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than ADVDX's 8.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.16% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | 8.77% | 8.53% | 5.59% | 5.70% | 6.09% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 5.70% | 6.72% | 5.73% | 6.65% | 6.67% |
Drawdowns
STK vs. ADVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum ADVDX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and ADVDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STK | ADVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -62.03% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -10.44% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -24.53% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.74% | -36.33% | -5.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -8.53% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -16.60% | +9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 2.29% | +1.38% |
Volatility
STK vs. ADVDX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) at 4.78%. This indicates that STK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STK | ADVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 4.78% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 8.33% | +9.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.65% | 14.41% | +11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 13.81% | +11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 15.94% | +9.97% |