PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STIP vs. NFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STIP vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than NFRA's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has underperformed NFRA with an annualized return of 3.14%, while NFRA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.41% annualized return.


STIP

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
3.14%

NFRA

1D
0.72%
1M
0.76%
YTD
9.54%
6M
10.58%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STIP vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.87%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
9.54%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%26.27%-7.74%15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between STIP and NFRA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013

0.18

The correlation between STIP and NFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STIP vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STIP vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STIPNFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.24

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.63

1.89

+4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.91

5.96

+19.95

STIP vs. NFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the NFRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STIP and NFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STIP vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum NFRA drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and NFRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STIPNFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-32.49%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-7.28%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.95%

-11.15%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

-22.75%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

-32.49%

+26.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.60%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-4.52%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

2.32%

-2.14%

Volatility

STIP vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.41%, while FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STIPNFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

3.19%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

8.35%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45%

10.44%

-8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

12.99%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

14.96%

-12.51%

STIP vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

STIP vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison

STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than NFRA's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.51%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.31%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STIP and NFRA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFRA has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to STIP (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs NFRA's -32.49%.

On 10-year performance, NFRA leads with 7.41% vs 3.14% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFRA has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for NFRA.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 4.31% for STIP.

STIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while NFRA is Utilities Equities. STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.47% for NFRA.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STIP and NFRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer