STHH vs. METW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while METW tracks the Ball Metaverse Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 115.16% vs -33.64% for METW. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for METW.

Performance

STHH vs. METW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 108.31% return, which is significantly higher than METW's -21.28% return.

STHH

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -22.86%
• 6M: 95.26%
• YTD: 108.31%
• 1Y: 115.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 102.44%

METW

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -6.21%
• 6M: -28.15%
• YTD: -21.28%
• 1Y: -33.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -25.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	$410.48K	$431.36K	$525.98K
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	$187.95K	$364.56K	$515.16K

STHH vs. METW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	108.31%	-10.10%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-21.28%	-9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and METW is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

STHH vs. METW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 80
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 77

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 2
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 3
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STHH vs. METW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	METW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	-0.79	+2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	-1.01	+3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.87	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	-0.89	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	-1.54	+11.16

STHH vs. METW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the METW Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHH and METW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STHH vs. METW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -37.98%, smaller than the maximum METW drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and METW.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	METW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.98%	-40.52%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.98%	-40.52%	+2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.48%	-37.54%	+4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-19.25%	+8.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	23.36%	-11.89%

Volatility

STHH vs. METW - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) at 18.32%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STHH	METW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.97%	18.32%	+8.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.55%	36.37%	+12.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.49%	47.45%	+9.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.17%	45.63%	+9.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.17%	45.63%	+9.54%

STHH vs. METW - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than METW's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

STHH vs. METW - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than METW's 65.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	65.46%	30.89%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.97%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and METW in my portfolio?

STHH and METW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STHH or METW?

STHH has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to METW (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -37.98% vs METW's -40.52%.

Which ETF is better, STHH or METW?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 115.16% vs -33.64% for METW. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, METW has been the lower-risk option at 18.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STHH or METW?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 115.16% return vs -33.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or METW?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or METW?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 65.46%, compared with 0.97% for STHH.

What is the main difference between STHH and METW?

STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.59% for METW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.