STHH vs. METW
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while METW tracks the Ball Metaverse Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for METW.
Performance
STHH vs. METW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 209.56% return, which is significantly higher than METW's -8.79% return.
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH vs. METW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | -10.65% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -8.79% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and METW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. METW — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
METW
STHH vs. METW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHH | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.20 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHH | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.44 | -0.40 | +4.84 |
Drawdowns
STHH vs. METW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum METW drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and METW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -40.52% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.63% | +27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -17.31% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | — | — |
Volatility
STHH vs. METW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | METW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.39% | 42.57% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 42.57% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.44% | 42.57% | +6.87% |
STHH vs. METW - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than METW's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
STHH vs. METW - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than METW's 55.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and METW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.
STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while METW tracks Ball Metaverse Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.59% for METW.
Find the right allocation for STHH and METW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer