ST vs. APH
ST (Sensata Technologies Holding plc) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ST in Scientific & Technical Instruments, APH in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, ST returned 2.69%/yr vs 28.23%/yr for APH. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
ST vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ST achieves a 41.49% return, which is significantly higher than APH's 21.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ST has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 2.69%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.23% annualized return.
ST
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- YTD
- 41.49%
- 1Y
- 58.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- -3.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
APH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 1Y
- 57.66%
- 3Y*
- 56.51%
- 5Y*
- 36.04%
- 10Y*
- 28.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.23B | $1.08B | $1.42B | |
| $97.97M | $81.94M | $102.84M |
ST vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 41.49% | 23.53% | -26.08% | -5.87% | -34.05% | 16.97% | -2.10% | 20.14% | -12.27% | 31.22% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 21.29% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ST and APH is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ST and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ST:
$6.81B
APH:
$200.95B
ST:
$0.61
APH:
$4.00
ST:
76.41
APH:
40.81
ST:
1.82
APH:
7.25
ST:
2.32
APH:
13.60
ST:
$3.78B
APH:
$29.01B
ST:
$1.07B
APH:
$11.17B
ST:
$553.02M
APH:
$9.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ST vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
ST
APH
ST vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ST | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.06 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 5.05 | +2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ST vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ST drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ST and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ST | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -63.41% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.00% | -28.19% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.40% | -28.19% | -30.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.75% | -28.73% | -43.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.75% | -37.56% | -34.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.87% | -7.36% | -16.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.79% | -13.54% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 11.44% | -4.04% |
Volatility
ST vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) is 9.73%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that ST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ST | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 13.08% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.36% | 35.45% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.05% | 44.28% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.05% | 31.53% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.94% | 28.34% | +6.60% |
Dividends
ST vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than APH's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 1.03% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.25% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ST vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensata Technologies Holding plc and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ST vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
ST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a gross profit of 301.80M and revenue of 990.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.55B and revenue of 8.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.
ST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported an operating income of 165.40M and revenue of 990.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.
ST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a net income of 102.10M and revenue of 990.60M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 1.77B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ST and APH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to ST (9.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ST dropped -71.75% vs APH's -63.41%.
ST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ST and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer