ST vs. GRNY
ST (Sensata Technologies Holding plc) is a stock, while GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs. Over the past year, ST returned 104.55% vs 29.75% for GRNY. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ST vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ST achieves a 61.83% return, which is significantly higher than GRNY's 11.15% return.
ST
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 30.55%
- YTD
- 61.83%
- 6M
- 63.80%
- 1Y
- 104.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
GRNY
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ST vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 61.83% | 23.53% | -17.86% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | 11.15% | 24.05% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ST and GRNY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ST and GRNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ST vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
ST
GRNY
ST vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ST | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | 1.70 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 2.30 | +1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.22 | 2.57 | +4.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.27 | 7.85 | +10.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ST | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.70 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.96 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
ST vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ST drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ST and GRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ST | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -24.18% | -47.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -11.63% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.93% | -0.76% | -12.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.79% | -4.03% | -18.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 3.80% | +1.94% |
Volatility
ST vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 4.23%. This indicates that ST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ST | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.88% | 4.23% | +10.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 12.70% | +16.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.23% | 17.59% | +21.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 23.19% | +13.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.87% | 23.19% | +11.68% |
Dividends
ST vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.25% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ST and GRNY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ST has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to GRNY (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ST dropped -71.75% vs GRNY's -24.18%.
ST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ST and GRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer