SSXU vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SSXU (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSXU returned 11.59%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MCSE. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SSXU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

SSXU vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

SSXU

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: -0.99%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 16.44%
• 3Y*: 11.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.39%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF	$118.06K	$72.09K	$330.31K

SSXU vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF	3.85%	27.09%	5.28%	9.56%	10.41%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-9.46%	14.86%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SSXU and MCSE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between SSXU and MCSE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSXU vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSXU	MCSE
Financial Services	26.9%	2.1%
Industrials	16.8%	18.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	13.8%
Technology	8.3%	31.1%
Basic Materials	8.2%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.0%
Communication Services	6.1%	4.7%
Energy	5.3%	-
Healthcare	5.2%	20.1%
Utilities	4.7%	-
Real Estate	3.4%	-

Return for Risk

SSXU vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSXU

SSXU Risk / Return Rank: 40
SSXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SSXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SSXU Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SSXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SSXU Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 20
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSXU vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSXU	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.46	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	0.70	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.12	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	0.45	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.54	1.13	+3.41

SSXU vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXU and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSXU vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSXU	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.91%	-26.36%	+12.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-10.42%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	-26.36%	+12.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.63%	-10.51%	+5.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-8.80%	+5.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	4.37%	-0.74%

Volatility

SSXU vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSXU	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	0.00%	+5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	1.87%	+10.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	10.29%	+4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	19.07%	-4.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.47%	19.07%	-4.60%

SSXU vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSXU vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF	2.56%	2.66%	2.74%	2.07%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSXU and MCSE in my portfolio?

SSXU and MCSE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSXU or MCSE?

SSXU has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, SSXU or MCSE?

On 3-year performance, SSXU leads with 11.59% vs 0.74% for MCSE. On fees, MCSE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SSXU or MCSE?

Over the 3-year period, SSXU has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSXU or MCSE?

MCSE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSXU or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.56% for SSXU.

What is the main difference between SSXU and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.