PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSXU vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSXU vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 12.14% return.


SSXU

1D
0.49%
1M
0.62%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
3.85%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.39%

BKIE

1D
0.38%
1M
1.67%
6M
6.74%
YTD
12.14%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.46M$7.01M$6.05M
$118.06K$72.09K$330.31K

SSXU vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SSXU
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF
3.85%27.09%5.28%9.56%2.14%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
12.14%32.08%4.63%18.25%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SSXU and BKIE is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.94

The correlation between SSXU and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSXU vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSXU
BKIE

Financial Services

26.9%
26.6%

Industrials

16.8%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.2%

Technology

8.3%
11.7%

Basic Materials

8.2%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
6.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
4.1%

Energy

5.3%
5.0%

Healthcare

5.2%
9.1%

Utilities

4.7%
3.5%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.8%

Financial Services

SSXU
26.9%
BKIE
26.6%

Industrials

SSXU
16.8%
BKIE
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SSXU
8.6%
BKIE
7.2%

Technology

SSXU
8.3%
BKIE
11.7%

Basic Materials

SSXU
8.2%
BKIE
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

SSXU
6.5%
BKIE
6.3%

Communication Services

SSXU
6.1%
BKIE
4.1%

Energy

SSXU
5.3%
BKIE
5.0%

Healthcare

SSXU
5.2%
BKIE
9.1%

Utilities

SSXU
4.7%
BKIE
3.5%

Real Estate

SSXU
3.4%
BKIE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSXU vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSXU
SSXU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SSXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSXU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSXU vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSXUBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.34

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

9.09

-4.56

SSXU vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXU and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSXU vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSXUBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-28.19%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-11.41%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-13.19%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-0.32%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-4.88%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.93%

+0.70%

Volatility

SSXU vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.12%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSXUBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.12%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

12.98%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

15.24%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

16.22%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

16.32%

-1.85%

SSXU vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSXU vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than BKIE's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.14%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%
SSXU
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF
2.56%2.66%2.74%2.07%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SSXU and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSXU has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to BKIE (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 3-year performance, BKIE leads with 18.16% vs 11.59% for SSXU. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.56% for SSXU.

They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSXU and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer