SSXU vs. BIL
SSXU (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSXU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Day Hagan, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. SSXU is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSXU returned 12.76%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SSXU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
SSXU vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.66% return.
SSXU
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
SSXU vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 4.58% | 27.09% | 5.28% | 9.56% | 2.14% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXU and BIL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXU vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
SSXU
BIL
SSXU vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXU | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -171.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 87.41 | -86.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 353.28 | -351.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 2,801.35 | -2,795.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXU vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXU | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -0.78% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -0.01% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | -0.01% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | 0.00% | -3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -0.26% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.00% | +3.14% |
Volatility
SSXU vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXU | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 0.07% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 0.14% | +11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 0.20% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 0.26% | +14.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 0.26% | +14.14% |
SSXU vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSXU vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 2.54% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 2.07% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXU and BIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSXU has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 3-year performance, SSXU leads with 12.76% vs 4.60% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SSXU has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.54% for SSXU.
SSXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.37 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSXU and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer