PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSRM vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSRM vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 51.57% return.


SSRM

1D
-3.97%
1M
-11.13%
6M
12.22%
YTD
16.88%
1Y
114.39%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
6.63%
ALL TIME*
6.34%

NVT

1D
6.24%
1M
-3.72%
6M
37.41%
YTD
51.57%
1Y
97.47%
3Y*
42.62%
5Y*
39.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$373.02M$340.45M$350.68M
$78.06M$81.55M$92.56M

SSRM vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
16.88%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%59.31%18.30%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
51.57%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SSRM and NVT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.10

The correlation between SSRM and NVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSRM:

$5.32B

NVT:

$24.88B

EPS

SSRM:

$3.26

NVT:

$3.63

PE Ratio

SSRM:

7.85

NVT:

42.34

PEG Ratio

SSRM:

0.12

NVT:

1.02

PS Ratio

SSRM:

2.93

NVT:

5.23

PB Ratio

SSRM:

1.26

NVT:

6.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSRM:

$1.90B

NVT:

$4.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSRM:

$643.76M

NVT:

$1.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSRM:

$835.27M

NVT:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSRM vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSRM vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSRMNVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.57

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

13.66

-5.59

SSRM vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSRM and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSRM vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSRMNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.68%

-56.18%

-35.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-27.42%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

-46.67%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.16%

-46.67%

-36.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.14%

-16.44%

-24.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-11.83%

-45.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.23%

7.16%

+7.07%

Volatility

SSRM vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and nVent Electric plc (NVT) have volatilities of 17.57% and 16.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSRMNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.57%

16.96%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.14%

36.03%

+19.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.57%

45.95%

+22.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.61%

37.09%

+19.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.15%

38.93%

+14.22%

Dividends

SSRM vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.54%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SSRM vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SSRM vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SSR Mining Inc. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 558.00M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 300.70M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 215.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSRM and NVT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (17.57%) compared to NVT (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSRM and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer