SSRM vs. MU
SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SSRM returned 6.63%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for MU. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SSRM vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 6.63%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.33% annualized return.
SSRM
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 114.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.34%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | $78.06M | $81.55M | $92.56M |
SSRM vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 16.88% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSRM and MU is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996 | 0.09 |
The correlation between SSRM and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSRM:
$5.32B
MU:
$929.52B
SSRM:
$3.26
MU:
$44.42
SSRM:
7.85
MU:
18.53
SSRM:
0.12
MU:
0.07
SSRM:
2.93
MU:
10.36
SSRM:
1.26
MU:
9.33
SSRM:
$1.90B
MU:
$90.27B
SSRM:
$643.76M
MU:
$65.51B
SSRM:
$835.27M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSRM vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
SSRM
MU
SSRM vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSRM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 16.92 | -13.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 64.08 | -56.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSRM vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSRM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -98.25% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.28% | -39.10% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | -57.63% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.16% | -57.63% | -25.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.16% | -57.63% | -25.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.14% | -32.17% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -58.02% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.23% | 10.31% | +3.92% |
Volatility
SSRM vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) is 17.57%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that SSRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSRM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.57% | 31.11% | -13.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.14% | 67.64% | -12.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.57% | 81.13% | -12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.61% | 56.32% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.15% | 51.42% | +1.73% |
Dividends
SSRM vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Financials
SSRM vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SSRM vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSRM and MU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to SSRM (17.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSRM and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer