PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSRM vs. MPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSRM vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly lower than MPWR's 74.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has underperformed MPWR with an annualized return of 9.58%, while MPWR has yielded a comparatively higher 37.94% annualized return.


SSRM

1D
3.46%
1M
-21.64%
YTD
24.22%
6M
22.60%
1Y
119.07%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.58%

MPWR

1D
-0.77%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
74.38%
6M
67.26%
1Y
121.18%
3Y*
44.43%
5Y*
36.35%
10Y*
37.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSRM vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
24.22%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%59.31%37.54%-1.46%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
74.38%54.45%-5.55%79.78%-27.78%35.49%107.49%54.80%4.49%38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SSRM and MPWR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.15

The correlation between SSRM and MPWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSRM:

$5.93B

MPWR:

$77.67B

EPS

SSRM:

$3.27

MPWR:

$13.89

PE Ratio

SSRM:

8.34

MPWR:

113.54

PEG Ratio

SSRM:

0.13

MPWR:

1.43

PS Ratio

SSRM:

3.11

MPWR:

25.93

PB Ratio

SSRM:

1.34

MPWR:

21.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSRM:

$1.90B

MPWR:

$2.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSRM:

$643.76M

MPWR:

$1.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSRM:

$835.27M

MPWR:

$861.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSRM vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MPWR
MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSRM vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSRMMPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

5.43

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

14.45

-4.57

SSRM vs. MPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MPWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSRM and MPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSRM vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than MPWR's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and MPWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSRMMPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.68%

-72.27%

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-22.45%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

-51.65%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.16%

-51.65%

-31.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

-51.65%

-31.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.45%

-6.66%

-30.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.15%

-17.71%

-39.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

8.44%

+3.65%

Volatility

SSRM vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) is 19.31%, while Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that SSRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSRMMPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.31%

20.33%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.27%

37.42%

+16.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.63%

48.53%

+18.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.93%

53.53%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.96%

47.23%

+5.73%

Dividends

SSRM vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison

SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.42%0.69%0.85%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SSRM vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
581.78M
804.19M
(SSRM) Total Revenue
(MPWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSRM vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SSR Mining Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
55.3%
Portfolio components
SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSRM and MPWR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPWR has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to SSRM (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs MPWR's -72.27%.

MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSRM and MPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer