PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MPWR vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MPWRCDNS
YTD Return3.65%0.80%
1Y Return40.47%31.38%
3Y Return (Ann)22.67%27.76%
5Y Return (Ann)36.27%31.42%
10Y Return (Ann)34.70%33.32%
Sharpe Ratio0.831.07
Daily Std Dev47.75%28.30%
Max Drawdown-72.27%-93.13%
Current Drawdown-14.82%-14.95%

Fundamentals


MPWRCDNS
Market Cap$32.95B$76.85B
EPS$8.74$3.84
PE Ratio77.4973.54
PEG Ratio2.632.84
Revenue (TTM)$1.82B$4.08B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.05B$3.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$521.90M$1.36B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MPWR and CDNS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MPWR vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 0.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MPWR having a 34.70% annualized return and CDNS not far behind at 33.32%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7,544.70%
1,958.10%
MPWR
CDNS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPWR vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPWR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPWR, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPWR, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPWR, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPWR, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPWR, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.15
CDNS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.44

MPWR vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which roughly equals the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MPWR and CDNS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.83
1.07
MPWR
CDNS

Dividends

MPWR vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.65%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%0.90%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MPWR vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.82%
-14.95%
MPWR
CDNS

Volatility

MPWR vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 6.83%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.28%
6.83%
MPWR
CDNS

Financials

MPWR vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items