MPWR vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Performance
MPWR vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPWR vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 20.87% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | 4.49% | 38.23% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -11.10% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$53.76B
CDNS:
$75.84B
MPWR:
$12.72
CDNS:
$4.06
MPWR:
85.93
CDNS:
68.49
MPWR:
1.08
CDNS:
5.22
MPWR:
18.97
CDNS:
14.34
MPWR:
14.45
CDNS:
10.67
MPWR:
$2.79B
CDNS:
$5.30B
MPWR:
$1.54B
CDNS:
$5.09B
MPWR:
$777.30M
CDNS:
$1.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MPWR has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 33.84%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 27.94% annualized return.
MPWR
- 1D
- 9.30%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 89.95%
- 3Y*
- 30.74%
- 5Y*
- 25.27%
- 10Y*
- 33.84%
CDNS
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 27.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
CDNS
MPWR vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPWR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 0.23 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 0.63 | +1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 0.29 | +3.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 0.65 | +9.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPWR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 0.23 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.84 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.22 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and CDNS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MPWR vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.61% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and CDNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -93.13% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -28.09% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -29.59% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | -32.12% | -19.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.07% | -25.58% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -39.79% | +21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 12.61% | -3.63% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 16.61% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.46%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.61% | 7.46% | +9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.32% | 25.41% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.06% | 39.60% | +16.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.63% | 35.27% | +17.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.56% | 33.43% | +13.13% |
Financials
MPWR vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities