SSRM vs. ARRNF
SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) and ARRNF (American Rare Earths Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SSRM in Gold, ARRNF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, SSRM returned 9.68%/yr vs 70.00%/yr for ARRNF. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 21.40% return, which is significantly lower than ARRNF's 35.21% return.
SSRM
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -22.19%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 108.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
ARRNF
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 35.21%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.22%
- 5Y*
- 70.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 21.40% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | -15.89% |
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 35.21% | 23.89% | 41.25% | -11.60% | 4.42% | 550.00% | -20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSRM and ARRNF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
SSRM:
$5.79B
ARRNF:
$158.25M
SSRM:
$3.27
ARRNF:
-$0.02
SSRM:
1.31
ARRNF:
3.28
SSRM:
$1.90B
ARRNF:
-$128.85K
SSRM:
$643.76M
ARRNF:
-$385.87K
SSRM:
$835.27M
ARRNF:
-$12.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSRM vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank
SSRM
ARRNF
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSRM | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 0.88 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 1.23 | +8.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSRM | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.48 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.22 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.18 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than ARRNF's maximum drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and ARRNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSRM | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -83.01% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -69.13% | +38.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | -69.13% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.16% | -83.01% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.87% | -58.26% | +19.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.17% | -46.26% | -10.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.59% | 49.30% | -37.71% |
Volatility
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) is 18.01%, while American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that SSRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSRM | ARRNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.01% | 23.76% | -5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.47% | 49.76% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.17% | 126.61% | -60.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.82% | 314.61% | -258.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.90% | 290.23% | -237.33% |
Dividends
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSRM nor ARRNF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARRNF American Rare Earths Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Financials
SSRM vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SSRM and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARRNF has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to SSRM (18.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSRM and ARRNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer