PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while XSLR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLR.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than XSLR.DE's -20.93% return.


SSLN.L

1D
3.08%
1M
-20.04%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-20.49%
1Y
71.23%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
11.54%

XSLR.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.54%
YTD
-20.93%
6M
-20.93%
1Y
70.14%
3Y*
35.49%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-15.38%130.26%23.21%-6.20%15.75%-11.83%59.50%
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-20.93%141.83%25.20%-6.16%16.81%-12.71%45.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLN.L and XSLR.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.93

The correlation between SSLN.L and XSLR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSLN.LXSLR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.51

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

3.39

+0.02

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLN.L and XSLR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than XSLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -46.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and XSLR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLN.LXSLR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.44%

-46.55%

-31.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.19%

-46.55%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.19%

-46.55%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-46.55%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.56%

-45.80%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-14.45%

-45.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.86%

20.78%

+0.08%

Volatility

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) at 14.17%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLN.LXSLR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.91%

14.17%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

52.73%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.25%

59.85%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.68%

34.84%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.05%

34.93%

-3.88%

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSLN.L and XSLR.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSLN.L vs. XSLR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSLN.L nor XSLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SSLN.L and XSLR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSLN.L and XSLR.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Both ETFs track LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and XSLR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer