SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while WQDS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSLN.L returned 17.80%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for WQDS.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for WQDS.L.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -19.65% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 15.20% return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -18.72%
- 6M
- -37.29%
- YTD
- -19.65%
- 1Y
- 51.77%
- 3Y*
- 30.84%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
WQDS.L
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- YTD
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -19.65% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.83% | 41.04% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -7.93% |
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.20% | 15.54% | 11.68% | 10.80% | 4.05% | 17.47% | -3.37% | 18.77% | -5.32% | -20.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and WQDS.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
WQDS.L
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.49 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 4.14 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 15.36 | -13.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and WQDS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -30.62% | -47.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.30% | -6.75% | -41.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.30% | -14.93% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.30% | -14.93% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.30% | -1.36% | -46.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.60% | -8.99% | -50.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.96% | 1.82% | +21.14% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) at 2.80%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | WQDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.49% | 2.80% | +10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.20% | 8.17% | +43.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.78% | 10.50% | +46.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 11.60% | +25.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 14.96% | +16.14% |
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.15% | 2.34% | 2.56% | 2.86% | 2.97% | 2.70% | 3.03% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and WQDS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer