SSLN.L vs. IBIT
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SSLN.L returned 88.53% vs -39.68% for IBIT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.04% return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.29%
- 1M
- -22.94%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 88.53%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
IBIT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -19.42%
- YTD
- -27.04%
- 6M
- -29.78%
- 1Y
- -39.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.21% | 130.26% | 28.03% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.04% | -13.08% | 93.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and IBIT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
IBIT
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.85 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.77 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | -1.35 | +6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -51.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -51.61% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.08% | -51.61% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | -49.16% | +10.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.69% | -17.08% | -42.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.73% | 29.41% | -10.68% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 12.11%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 12.11% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.43% | 33.39% | +19.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.28% | 42.96% | +12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 49.62% | -13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 49.62% | -18.48% |
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and IBIT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer