SSLN.L vs. ARKQ
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. SSLN.L is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 14.83%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for ARKQ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while ARKQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKQ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 13.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 14.83%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.35% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.29%
- 1M
- -22.94%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 88.53%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
ARKQ
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 12.97%
- 1Y
- 57.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 22.35%
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.21% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.83% | 41.04% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 13.44% | 38.21% | 36.22% | 33.66% | -40.42% | 2.71% | 101.12% | 21.15% | -2.43% | 39.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and ARKQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between SSLN.L and ARKQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
ARKQ
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.99 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 7.98 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and ARKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -53.76% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.08% | -19.42% | -22.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.08% | -33.02% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.08% | -50.01% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | -53.76% | +11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | -9.75% | -29.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.69% | -15.40% | -44.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.73% | 7.25% | +11.48% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 12.01%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 12.01% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.43% | 24.21% | +28.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.28% | 32.10% | +23.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 30.64% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 29.03% | +2.11% |
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.75% for ARKQ.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and ARKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer