SSG vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSG is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SSG returned -78.94% vs -73.99% for CRMG. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

SSG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -58.97% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.

SSG

• 1D: 12.02%
• 1M: -11.92%
• YTD: -58.97%
• 6M: -57.87%
• 1Y: -78.94%
• 3Y*: -74.04%
• 5Y*: -66.24%
• 10Y*: -62.09%

CRMG

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -29.64%
• YTD: -71.26%
• 6M: -71.01%
• 1Y: -73.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors	-58.97%	-79.08%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-71.26%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SSG and CRMG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	-0.12

The correlation between SSG and CRMG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to -0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SSG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSG

SSG Risk / Return Rank: 0
SSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SSG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SSG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	-0.97	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.60	-1.82	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	0.79	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.97	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	-1.70	+0.07

SSG vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSG Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is comparable to the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSG and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSG	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-79.83%	-20.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.92%	-76.80%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-78.97%	-21.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.60%	-39.18%	-49.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.14%	43.41%	+7.73%

Volatility

SSG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) have volatilities of 33.37% and 32.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSG	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.37%	32.53%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.63%	63.74%	-9.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.68%	76.12%	-7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.55%	75.39%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.63%	75.39%	-5.76%

SSG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors	12.72%	9.19%	7.67%	6.73%	0.75%	0.00%	0.34%	1.81%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSG and CRMG in my portfolio?

SSG and CRMG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSG or CRMG?

SSG has higher volatility (33.37%) compared to CRMG (32.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

Which ETF is better, SSG or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, CRMG leads with -73.99% vs -78.94% for SSG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 32.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SSG or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, CRMG has performed better with a -73.99% return vs -78.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSG or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSG or CRMG?

SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between SSG and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.97 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.