SSG vs. SMG
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SSG returned -61.29%/yr vs 1.73%/yr for SMG. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SSG vs. SMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -57.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMG's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SSG has underperformed SMG with an annualized return of -61.29%, while SMG has yielded a comparatively higher 1.73% annualized return.
SSG
- 1D
- 8.63%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -54.30%
- YTD
- -57.11%
- 1Y
- -72.37%
- 3Y*
- -72.30%
- 5Y*
- -65.76%
- 10Y*
- -61.29%
SMG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- -3.63%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- -15.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
SSG vs. SMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -57.11% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 11.82% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and SMG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.38 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SSG and SMG has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.38 to -0.08, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. SMG — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
SMG
SSG vs. SMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSG | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.01 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.15 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | -0.27 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSG vs. SMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SMG's maximum drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and SMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -83.55% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.63% | -23.85% | -52.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.56% | -47.42% | -51.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.66% | -77.36% | -22.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -83.55% | -16.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -69.34% | -30.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -22.11% | -66.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.68% | 13.35% | +31.33% |
Volatility
SSG vs. SMG - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 32.79% compared to The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) at 11.78%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.79% | 11.78% | +21.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.10% | 27.52% | +30.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.72% | 35.34% | +36.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.07% | 46.49% | +32.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.87% | 40.51% | +29.36% |
Dividends
SSG vs. SMG - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than SMG's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.13% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 9.50% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and SMG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (32.79%) compared to SMG (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs SMG's -83.55%.
SMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and SMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer