SSG vs. SOXQ
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSG returned -64.98%/yr vs 28.65%/yr for SOXQ. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
SSG vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -54.20% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 59.97% return.
SSG
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- -48.20%
- YTD
- -54.20%
- 1Y
- -68.86%
- 3Y*
- -71.03%
- 5Y*
- -64.98%
- 10Y*
- -60.80%
- ALL TIME*
- -48.52%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- 6M
- 41.59%
- YTD
- 59.97%
- 1Y
- 105.49%
- 3Y*
- 44.02%
- 5Y*
- 28.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $219.33M | $233.61M | $278.30M | |
| $11.79M | $12.75M | $12.54M |
SSG vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -54.20% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -49.37% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 59.97% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and SOXQ is -0.89, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | -0.93 |
The correlation between SSG and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSG vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSG
SOXQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SSG
SOXQ
Basic Materials
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Industrials
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
SSG
-
SOXQ
Utilities
SSG
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
SOXQ
SSG vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 3.61 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 15.05 | -16.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSG vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -46.01% | -53.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.10% | -28.56% | -46.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.56% | -39.36% | -59.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.66% | -46.01% | -53.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -22.64% | -77.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.67% | -12.92% | -75.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.99% | 6.83% | +38.16% |
Volatility
SSG vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 28.95% compared to Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) at 17.19%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.95% | 17.19% | +11.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.00% | 37.70% | +24.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.90% | 43.52% | +31.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.59% | 38.28% | +41.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.22% | 37.93% | +32.29% |
SSG vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSG vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than SOXQ's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 8.90% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (28.95%) compared to SOXQ (17.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 28.65% vs -64.98% for SSG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 17.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 28.65% return vs -64.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 0.32% for SOXQ.
SSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer