PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCVX vs. VSFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than VSFAX's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed VSFAX with an annualized return of 10.41%, while VSFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


SSCVX

1D
0.59%
1M
2.79%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.24%
1Y
35.82%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
10.41%

VSFAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.84%
YTD
15.97%
6M
14.46%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
23.56%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
15.97%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-18.43%12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and VSFAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between SSCVX and VSFAX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. VSFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSCVXVSFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

3.11

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

10.37

+4.13

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the VSFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and VSFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, smaller than the maximum VSFAX drawdown of -78.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and VSFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCVXVSFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-78.14%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-9.67%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-30.07%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-30.07%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.87%

-48.57%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.07%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-20.81%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.90%

-0.34%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCVXVSFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.40%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

12.16%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

18.15%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

23.32%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

24.06%

-0.63%

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VSFAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCVX vs. VSFAX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than VSFAX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
8.87%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
2.98%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCVX and VSFAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSFAX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to SSCVX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs VSFAX's -78.14%.

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCVX and VSFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer