PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSFAX vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSFAX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VSFAX having a 13.66% return and VB slightly higher at 14.16%. Over the past 10 years, VSFAX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.45%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


VSFAX

1D
1.13%
1M
4.64%
YTD
13.66%
6M
14.60%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.45%

VB

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.12%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSFAX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
13.66%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-18.43%12.06%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.16%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VSFAX and VB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between VSFAX and VB has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSFAX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSFAX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSFAXVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.22

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

11.87

-1.23

VSFAX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSFAX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSFAXVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.34

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.53

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.44

-0.19

Drawdowns

VSFAX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSFAX drawdown since its inception was -78.14%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSFAX and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSFAXVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.14%

-59.56%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.98%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.07%

-25.36%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-28.15%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

-42.05%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.65%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-8.44%

-12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.43%

+0.47%

Volatility

VSFAX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.42%. This indicates that VSFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSFAXVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.42%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

11.72%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

16.28%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

20.74%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

21.42%

+2.64%

VSFAX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSFAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSFAX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

VSFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
3.04%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSFAX and VB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSFAX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSFAX dropped -78.14% vs VB's -59.56%.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSFAX and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer