USBNX vs. MXLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX).
USBNX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on Aug 3, 1992. MXLSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994.
Performance
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund | 1.48% | 8.02% | 8.64% | 12.83% | -5.09% | 15.35% | -4.77% | 23.53% | -11.05% | 6.42% |
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 1.81% | 4.08% | 8.20% | 17.81% | -10.07% | 31.12% | 2.84% | 24.67% | -16.64% | 8.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USBNX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than MXLSX's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, USBNX has underperformed MXLSX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while MXLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.
USBNX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
MXLSX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -6.65%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 13.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USBNX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MXLSX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USBNX vs. MXLSX — Risk / Return Rank
USBNX
MXLSX
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USBNX | MXLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.54 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.77 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 2.97 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USBNX | MXLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.54 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.28 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.37 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.25 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between USBNX and MXLSX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Dividend Comparison
USBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than MXLSX's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund | 13.61% | 13.81% | 3.27% | 0.86% | 10.05% | 0.75% | 0.68% | 7.91% | 8.39% | 6.21% | 1.17% | 7.39% |
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 0.47% | 0.48% | 1.07% | 2.24% | 2.93% | 6.23% | 0.23% | 0.47% | 2.92% | 5.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USBNX drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, which is greater than MXLSX's maximum drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBNX and MXLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USBNX | MXLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -60.41% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -15.02% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.01% | -26.04% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.96% | -43.52% | -3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -8.88% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -12.20% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 4.19% | -0.55% |
Volatility
USBNX vs. MXLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) is 3.82%, while Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that USBNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USBNX | MXLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.13% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 11.94% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.15% | 23.41% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 20.90% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 22.28% | -0.60% |