SSCVX vs. SHGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSCVX (Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund) and SHGTX (Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - SSCVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while SHGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX returned 9.68%/yr vs 27.87%/yr for SHGTX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSCVX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SHGTX.

Performance

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 58.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.87% annualized return.

SSCVX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 21.10%
• 6M: 19.02%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 16.06%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

SHGTX

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: 16.12%
• YTD: 58.37%
• 6M: 55.67%
• 1Y: 121.45%
• 3Y*: 46.55%
• 5Y*: 26.25%
• 10Y*: 27.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	21.10%	5.46%	12.33%	12.47%	-15.35%	31.25%	9.61%	18.76%	-13.70%	12.65%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	58.37%	35.09%	26.04%	45.28%	-31.70%	38.60%	45.56%	54.92%	-8.70%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and SHGTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SSCVX and SHGTX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCVX

SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SHGTX

SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 97
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSCVX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	4.85	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	5.10	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.69	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	10.16	-5.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.00	38.70	-23.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSCVX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	4.85	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.96	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	1.04	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.66	-0.33

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and SHGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCVX	SHGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.34%	-77.47%	+12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	-12.45%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.22%	-28.90%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	-43.17%	+13.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.87%	-43.17%	-5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	0.00%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-24.94%	+13.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	3.26%	-0.71%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) is 4.75%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that SSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCVX	SHGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	7.24%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	20.14%	-8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.41%	26.07%	-8.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	27.43%	-6.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.46%	26.79%	-3.33%

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCVX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than SHGTX's 5.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	5.33%	8.45%	14.04%	6.22%	3.94%	11.77%	9.92%	10.26%	12.75%	7.25%	8.13%	8.09%
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	9.05%	10.96%	20.45%	6.56%	4.62%	6.64%	6.45%	0.12%	7.59%	13.50%	6.18%	12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCVX and SHGTX in my portfolio?

SSCVX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCVX or SHGTX?

SHGTX has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to SSCVX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.