PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHGTX vs. RYSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) and Rydex Electronics Fund (RYSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHGTX achieves a 58.24% return, which is significantly lower than RYSIX's 98.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SHGTX has underperformed RYSIX with an annualized return of 27.99%, while RYSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.17% annualized return.


SHGTX

1D
3.81%
1M
8.06%
YTD
58.24%
6M
55.76%
1Y
114.39%
3Y*
44.50%
5Y*
25.92%
10Y*
27.99%

RYSIX

1D
2.06%
1M
15.79%
YTD
98.05%
6M
94.97%
1Y
172.14%
3Y*
55.86%
5Y*
33.82%
10Y*
33.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
58.24%35.09%26.04%45.28%-31.70%38.60%45.56%54.92%-8.70%34.52%
RYSIX
Rydex Electronics Fund
98.05%42.02%16.66%55.69%-32.46%38.65%56.73%59.80%-12.42%31.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SHGTX and RYSIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.88

The correlation between SHGTX and RYSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHGTX vs. RYSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHGTX
SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RYSIX
RYSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RYSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) and Rydex Electronics Fund (RYSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHGTXRYSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.65

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.28

11.74

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.22

41.81

-8.59

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHGTX Sharpe Ratio is 4.17, which is comparable to the RYSIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHGTX and RYSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHGTX drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, smaller than the maximum RYSIX drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHGTX and RYSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHGTXRYSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-88.66%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-14.87%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-40.57%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.17%

-43.80%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.17%

-43.80%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-49.62%

+24.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

4.17%

-0.70%

Volatility

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) is 11.69%, while Rydex Electronics Fund (RYSIX) has a volatility of 18.87%. This indicates that SHGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHGTXRYSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.69%

18.87%

-7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

29.92%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.74%

36.55%

-8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.77%

36.88%

-9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

34.00%

-7.04%

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RYSIX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHGTX vs. RYSIX - Dividend Comparison

SHGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than RYSIX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYSIX
Rydex Electronics Fund
1.64%3.24%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.34%2.04%0.01%10.18%0.05%0.00%0.16%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
5.34%8.45%14.04%6.22%3.94%11.77%9.92%10.26%12.75%7.25%8.13%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHGTX and RYSIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYSIX has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to SHGTX (11.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHGTX dropped -77.47% vs RYSIX's -88.66%.

RYSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.79 vs 4.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHGTX and RYSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer