PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCGX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 16.82% return.


SSCGX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
14.90%
6M
12.38%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
7.41%

FECGX

1D
-1.38%
1M
2.39%
YTD
16.82%
6M
13.67%
1Y
37.46%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
14.90%4.30%16.63%13.71%-23.11%-9.33%22.69%4.97%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
16.82%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCGX and FECGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.96

The correlation between SSCGX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCGX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCGX
SSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCGXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.54

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

9.15

-0.61

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCGX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCGXFECGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.76

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.24

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.38

-0.12

Drawdowns

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCGXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-41.85%

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-14.81%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.27%

-28.45%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-40.34%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.80%

-1.38%

-7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-15.76%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

4.10%

-0.97%

Volatility

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) is 5.71%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that SSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCGXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

6.62%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

15.82%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

21.40%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.58%

24.54%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.70%

27.19%

-3.49%

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCGX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than FECGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
9.11%10.47%7.05%0.00%0.05%1.75%0.00%3.29%17.03%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SSCGX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to SSCGX (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCGX dropped -71.03% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCGX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer