PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FECGX vs. FCPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FECGX achieves a 22.18% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 25.26% return.


FECGX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.18%
6M
18.79%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*

FCPGX

1D
1.23%
1M
7.49%
YTD
25.26%
6M
21.54%
1Y
44.87%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
15.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
22.18%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
25.26%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FECGX and FCPGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FECGX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FECGX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FECGXFCPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.52

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

14.02

-3.45

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECGX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and FCPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FECGXFCPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-59.11%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-13.12%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.45%

-28.69%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-39.04%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.65%

-10.68%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.28%

+0.85%

Volatility

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) have volatilities of 7.66% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FECGXFCPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

7.84%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

17.31%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

22.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.70%

23.68%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

22.94%

+4.27%

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FECGX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FCPGX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.10%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FECGX and FCPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCPGX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FECGX (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FECGX and FCPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer