SSCGX vs. CMCIX
SSCGX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, SSCGX returned 26.72% vs 0.03% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCGX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 2.70% return.
SSCGX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 0.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund | 14.90% | 4.30% | 16.63% | 9.98% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.70% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCGX and CMCIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SSCGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSCGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCGX
CMCIX
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | -0.02 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | -0.05 | +8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | -0.02 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.34 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.03% | -21.50% | -49.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -11.68% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.80% | -9.93% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.11% | -6.45% | -18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 4.99% | -1.86% |
Volatility
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.71%. This indicates that SSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 3.71% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 10.57% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 15.15% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.58% | 16.53% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.70% | 16.53% | +7.17% |
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSCGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.11% | 10.47% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 3.29% | 17.03% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSCGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSCGX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to CMCIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCGX dropped -71.03% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
SSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSCGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer