CMCIX vs. DTSGX
CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) and DTSGX (Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, CMCIX returned 6.56% vs 33.31% for DTSGX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMCIX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for DTSGX.
Performance
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCIX achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than DTSGX's 5.47% return.
CMCIX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTSGX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.58% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
DTSGX Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio | 5.47% | 7.91% | 4.24% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCIX and DTSGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CMCIX and DTSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCIX vs. DTSGX — Risk / Return Rank
CMCIX
DTSGX
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) and Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMCIX | DTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 1.72 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 2.43 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.39 | -1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 9.03 | -7.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMCIX | DTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.72 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCIX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum DTSGX drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCIX and DTSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCIX | DTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -56.83% | +35.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -13.28% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.04% | -11.22% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -13.37% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 3.52% | +1.16% |
Volatility
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) is 5.36%, while Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that CMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMCIX | DTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 8.30% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 16.53% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 20.49% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 23.69% | -6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 23.26% | -6.56% |
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMCIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than DTSGX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMCIX vs. DTSGX - Dividend Comparison
CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, while DTSGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTSGX Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.61% | 38.28% | 12.13% | 2.46% | 6.52% | 10.69% | 11.80% | 5.94% |