SRVR vs. XLY
SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -1.65%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for XLY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRVR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
SRVR vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.16% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
SRVR vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 18.64% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | -4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and XLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SRVR and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRVR vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRVR
XLY
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
SRVR
XLY
-
Industrials
SRVR
XLY
Communication Services
SRVR
XLY
Technology
SRVR
XLY
Energy
SRVR
XLY
-
Utilities
SRVR
XLY
-
Financial Services
SRVR
XLY
-
Basic Materials
SRVR
XLY
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRVR
-
XLY
Consumer Defensive
SRVR
-
XLY
-
Healthcare
SRVR
-
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
XLY
SRVR vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRVR | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 2.05 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -59.05% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -14.98% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -26.01% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -39.67% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -6.17% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -9.55% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 4.88% | +2.01% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 6.19% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 13.44% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 18.27% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 23.83% | -4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 22.08% | -0.62% |
SRVR vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.57% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and XLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to XLY (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLY leads with 7.00% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLY has performed better with a 7.00% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.13% for XLY.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer