SRVR vs. QDPL
SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -3.67%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for QDPL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRVR charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
SRVR vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.05% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- -4.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 6.87% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 5.41% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.05% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and QDPL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SRVR and QDPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
QDPL
SRVR vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRVR | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.30 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.35 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 10.34 | -10.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -22.59% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -8.65% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -17.75% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -22.59% | -18.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.75% | -0.96% | -20.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -5.07% | -10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 1.96% | +5.59% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 3.06%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.06% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 9.87% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 12.47% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 15.03% | +4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 15.01% | +6.40% |
SRVR vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than QDPL's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.54% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.86% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and QDPL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to QDPL (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 5-year performance, QDPL leads with 12.25% vs -3.67% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 12.25% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.86% for SRVR.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index, while QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SRVR and 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer