SRVR vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -0.81%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

SRVR vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.

SRVR

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 20.69%
• 1Y: 11.19%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: -0.81%
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRVR vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	19.79%	-1.99%	2.70%	6.84%	-31.90%	22.31%	11.99%	41.98%	-3.51%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and GCOW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018	0.49

The correlation between SRVR and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRVR vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SRVR	GCOW
Real Estate	66.4%	-
Industrials	11.7%	12.4%
Communication Services	7.5%	14.6%
Technology	6.8%	0.9%
Energy	3.8%	24.4%
Utilities	2.2%	4.1%
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.1%
Healthcare	-	14.6%

Return for Risk

SRVR vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 19
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRVR vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRVR	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	2.52	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	3.63	-2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.44	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	5.71	-4.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	15.05	-13.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRVR vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRVR	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	2.52	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.92	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.59	-0.29

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRVR	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.99%	-37.64%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-4.77%	-10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.34%	-12.35%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	-21.48%	-19.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.28%	-2.73%	-9.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.27%	-5.84%	-9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.83%	1.81%	+5.02%

Volatility

SRVR vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRVR	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.47%	2.85%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	7.99%	+5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	10.81%	+5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.71%	13.49%	+6.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	16.20%	+5.24%

SRVR vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SRVR and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

SRVR vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	2.70%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRVR and GCOW in my portfolio?

SRVR and GCOW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRVR or GCOW?

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, SRVR or GCOW?

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs -0.81% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SRVR or GCOW?

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRVR or GCOW?

SRVR and GCOW have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SRVR or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.70% for SRVR.

What is the main difference between SRVR and GCOW?

SRVR is categorized as REIT, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.