SRVR vs. GCOW
SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -3.67%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRVR charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
SRVR vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 10.82% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- -4.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
SRVR vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 6.87% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 10.82% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and GCOW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SRVR and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
GCOW
SRVR vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRVR | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.90 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 8.96 | -9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -37.64% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -7.83% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -12.35% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -21.48% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.75% | -3.91% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -5.83% | -9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 2.53% | +5.02% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.90%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.90% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 8.62% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 11.08% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 13.53% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 15.99% | +5.42% |
SRVR vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than GCOW's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.75% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.86% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and GCOW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to GCOW (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.66% vs -3.67% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.66% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 2.86% for SRVR.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SRVR and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer