SRUUF vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
SRUUF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jul 19, 2021. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
SRUUF vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SRUUF vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 3.76% | 12.66% | -18.89% | 82.09% | 7.65% | 17.26% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -4.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRUUF achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's 4.19% return.
SRUUF
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 41.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SRUUF vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRUUF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SRUUF vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
SRUUF
CEF
SRUUF vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRUUF | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.83 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 2.12 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.61 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | 9.68 | -4.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRUUF | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.83 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.23 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SRUUF and CEF is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SRUUF vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
Neither SRUUF nor CEF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
SRUUF vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRUUF drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRUUF and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRUUF | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -62.29% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.98% | -26.77% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.39% | -19.41% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -27.38% | +5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 7.23% | +2.02% |
Volatility
SRUUF vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) is 11.92%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that SRUUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SRUUF | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.92% | 14.73% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.44% | 35.36% | -7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.98% | 37.38% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.29% | 23.78% | +18.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.29% | 21.58% | +20.71% |