SRUUF vs. BCSKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) and BCSKX (BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K) are both mutual funds - SRUUF is a Uranium fund actively managed by Sprott, while BCSKX is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. SRUUF is actively managed, while BCSKX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SRUUF returned 12.85%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for BCSKX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRUUF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for BCSKX.

Performance

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRUUF achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than BCSKX's 12.64% return.

SRUUF

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -4.02%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 6M: -4.52%
• 1Y: 1.69%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCSKX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -6.71%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	-4.41%	12.66%	-18.89%	82.09%	7.65%	17.26%
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K	12.64%	28.88%	4.44%	-4.27%	11.95%	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SRUUF and BCSKX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021	0.35

Return for Risk

SRUUF vs. BCSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRUUF

SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 3
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BCSKX

BCSKX Risk / Return Rank: 53
BCSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BCSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BCSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BCSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BCSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRUUF	BCSKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	1.86	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	2.42	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.32	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	3.07	-2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.14	12.40	-12.27

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRUUF Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the BCSKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRUUF and BCSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRUUF drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, which is greater than BCSKX's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRUUF and BCSKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRUUF	BCSKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-30.34%	-18.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.40%	-8.97%	-14.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.68%	-10.51%	-38.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.74%	-8.97%	-16.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.81%	-6.56%	-15.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.31%	2.23%	+10.08%

Volatility

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) at 3.86%. This indicates that SRUUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRUUF	BCSKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	3.86%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.18%	12.13%	+12.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.04%	14.84%	+19.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.68%	15.75%	+25.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.68%	15.04%	+26.64%

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRUUF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSKX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRUUF vs. BCSKX - Dividend Comparison

SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K	2.78%	3.13%	3.66%	9.45%	9.11%	2.72%	0.84%	2.08%	2.02%
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRUUF and BCSKX in my portfolio?

SRUUF and BCSKX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRUUF or BCSKX?

SRUUF has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to BCSKX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRUUF dropped -48.68% vs BCSKX's -30.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.