SROI vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SROI returned 14.78%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for WBIF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

SROI vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 12.01% return.

SROI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	11.41%	16.36%	9.48%	9.18%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	12.01%	9.16%	3.43%	-0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and WBIF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023	0.75

The correlation between SROI and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SROI vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SROI	WBIF
Technology	29.6%	19.9%
Industrials	18.1%	14.6%
Financial Services	13.6%	31.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	11.1%
Healthcare	8.8%	3.4%
Communication Services	7.4%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	3.1%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.0%
Utilities	2.5%	10.3%
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Energy	0.8%	2.9%

Return for Risk

SROI vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 45
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 64
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SROI	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.94	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.80	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	3.62	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	12.94	-4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SROI vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SROI	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.94	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.31	+0.71

Drawdowns

SROI vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-20.29%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-6.60%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	-17.16%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.61%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-7.73%	+5.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.84%	+0.52%

Volatility

SROI vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) have volatilities of 3.92% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SROI	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	4.11%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	8.63%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	12.29%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.86%	12.86%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	12.34%	+1.52%

SROI vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SROI vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SROI and WBIF in my portfolio?

SROI and WBIF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SROI or WBIF?

WBIF has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SROI (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, SROI or WBIF?

On 3-year performance, SROI leads with 14.78% vs 9.09% for WBIF. On fees, SROI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SROI has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SROI or WBIF?

Over the 3-year period, SROI has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SROI or WBIF?

SROI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SROI or WBIF?

SROI has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between SROI and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.