PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 4.52%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


SRLN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
4.52%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.68%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and SPYM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.45

The correlation between SRLN and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRLN vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRLN
SPYM

Communication Services

91.8%
10.6%

Industrials

8.2%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Communication Services

SRLN
91.8%
SPYM
10.6%

Industrials

SRLN
8.2%
SPYM
7.6%

Basic Materials

SRLN

-

SPYM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SRLN

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

SRLN

-

SPYM
4.6%

Energy

SRLN

-

SPYM
3.2%

Financial Services

SRLN

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

SRLN

-

SPYM
8.4%

Real Estate

SRLN

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

SRLN

-

SPYM
38.5%

Utilities

SRLN

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRLNSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.17

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

14.76

-8.41

SRLN vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRLNSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.39

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.83

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.87

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-54.46%

+32.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-8.90%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-18.72%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-24.48%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-33.87%

+11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.66%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-7.15%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.91%

-1.03%

Volatility

SRLN vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.44%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

2.83%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

8.90%

-6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

11.80%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

16.80%

-12.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

18.00%

-11.94%

SRLN vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.49%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and SPYM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to SRLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 4.52% for SRLN. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

SRLN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPYM is S&P 500. SRLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer