SRLN vs. LVLN
SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) and LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds from State Street. SRLN is actively managed, while LVLN is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVLN.
Performance
SRLN vs. LVLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than LVLN's 1.02% return.
SRLN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRLN vs. LVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.48% | 1.41% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRLN and LVLN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRLN vs. LVLN — Risk / Return Rank
SRLN
LVLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRLN vs. LVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRLN | LVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRLN vs. LVLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, which is greater than LVLN's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and LVLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRLN | LVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -2.34% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.14% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -0.53% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
SRLN vs. LVLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRLN | LVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 2.71% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 2.71% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 2.71% | +3.35% |
SRLN vs. LVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LVLN's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRLN vs. LVLN - Dividend Comparison
SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than LVLN's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.71% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.51% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRLN and LVLN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 3.71% for LVLN.
Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.40% for LVLN.
Find the right allocation for SRLN and LVLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer