SRET vs. VEA
SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRET is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRET returned 1.19%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for VEA. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
SRET vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SRET has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 1.19%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.
SRET
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
SRET vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 6.56% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 13.29% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRET and VEA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SRET and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRET vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
SRET
VEA
SRET vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRET | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.49 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 9.55 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRET vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRET | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -60.68% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -11.63% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -13.45% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -29.71% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.98% | -35.73% | -31.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.17% | -2.91% | -19.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.48% | -13.26% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 3.02% | -0.72% |
Volatility
SRET vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.78%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRET | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 7.08% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 14.73% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 16.78% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 16.76% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 17.20% | +7.39% |
SRET vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRET vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than VEA's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.91% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.58% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRET and VEA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to SRET (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.74% vs 1.19% for SRET. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 2.58% for VEA.
SRET is categorized as REIT, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRET and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer