PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRBFX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SRBFX having a 2.28% annualized return and MDVAX not far behind at 2.21%.


SRBFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
2.28%

MDVAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
0.43%8.91%1.49%7.35%-17.65%0.23%12.20%9.44%0.38%3.84%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.47%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SRBFX and MDVAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1999

0.86

The correlation between SRBFX and MDVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRBFX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRBFX
SRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRBFXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.76

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

15.86

-10.21

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRBFX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRBFXMDVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.54

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.05

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.42

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.71

+0.11

Drawdowns

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than MDVAX's maximum drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRBFXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-23.02%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.21%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

-5.44%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-23.02%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

-23.02%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-3.49%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-3.47%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.52%

+0.53%

Volatility

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that SRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRBFXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.95%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

2.17%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

3.28%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

6.46%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

5.27%

+0.18%

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRBFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRBFX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%
SRBFX
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund
4.87%4.86%4.11%3.74%3.72%3.23%7.56%4.59%2.85%2.77%3.93%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SRBFX and MDVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SRBFX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to MDVAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRBFX dropped -24.34% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRBFX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer