PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDVAX vs. MGFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDVAX achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than MGFAX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MDVAX has underperformed MGFAX with an annualized return of 2.18%, while MGFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.


MDVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.84%
YTD
2.59%
6M
3.06%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
2.18%

MGFAX

1D
2.43%
1M
5.26%
YTD
10.33%
6M
10.18%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.59%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.52%
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
10.33%14.37%15.01%33.87%-32.08%19.60%27.18%30.67%-14.19%35.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDVAX and MGFAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004

-0.05

The correlation between MDVAX and MGFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDVAX vs. MGFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MGFAX
MGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDVAXMGFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.32

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

4.87

+9.75

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the MGFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDVAX and MGFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDVAX drawdown since its inception was -23.02%, smaller than the maximum MGFAX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDVAX and MGFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDVAXMGFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.02%

-62.06%

+39.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-16.38%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-23.61%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-46.09%

+23.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

-46.09%

+23.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

0.00%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-13.57%

+10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

4.43%

-3.91%

Volatility

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) is 0.78%, while MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that MDVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDVAXMGFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

7.92%

-7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

14.59%

-12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

17.29%

-14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

33.62%

-27.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

27.64%

-22.37%

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDVAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFAX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDVAX vs. MGFAX - Dividend Comparison

MDVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than MGFAX's 39.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%
MGFAX
MassMutual Global Fund
39.57%43.66%16.85%30.43%28.11%15.89%5.05%0.36%27.78%12.10%3.75%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDVAX and MGFAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGFAX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to MDVAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDVAX dropped -23.02% vs MGFAX's -62.06%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDVAX and MGFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer