SRBFX vs. WOBDX
SRBFX (Columbia Total Return Bond Fund) and WOBDX (JPMorgan Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SRBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Columbia, while WOBDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX returned 2.30%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for WOBDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SRBFX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WOBDX.
Performance
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than WOBDX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX has outperformed WOBDX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while WOBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
SRBFX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
WOBDX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 0.60% | 8.91% | 1.49% | 7.35% | -17.65% | 0.23% | 12.20% | 9.44% | 0.38% | 3.84% |
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | 0.35% | 7.38% | 1.97% | 5.79% | -12.35% | -1.11% | 8.13% | 8.34% | 0.20% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRBFX and WOBDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1991 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SRBFX and WOBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRBFX vs. WOBDX — Risk / Return Rank
SRBFX
WOBDX
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRBFX | WOBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.91 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.75 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 5.31 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRBFX | WOBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.09 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.17 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than WOBDX's maximum drawdown of -16.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and WOBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRBFX | WOBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -16.65% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -2.99% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.28% | -5.96% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -16.65% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.97% | -16.65% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -1.70% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -1.90% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.99% | +0.05% |
Volatility
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) at 1.29%. This indicates that SRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRBFX | WOBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.29% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 2.77% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 3.89% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 5.69% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 4.71% | +0.74% |
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRBFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WOBDX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRBFX vs. WOBDX - Dividend Comparison
SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than WOBDX's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 4.86% | 4.86% | 4.11% | 3.74% | 3.72% | 3.23% | 7.56% | 4.59% | 2.85% | 2.77% | 3.93% | 3.42% |
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | 4.07% | 3.97% | 3.95% | 3.51% | 2.68% | 2.82% | 4.00% | 3.23% | 2.91% | 2.88% | 2.84% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SRBFX and WOBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SRBFX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to WOBDX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRBFX dropped -24.34% vs WOBDX's -16.65%.
SRBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRBFX and WOBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer