SRBFX vs. PDBZX
SRBFX (Columbia Total Return Bond Fund) and PDBZX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX returned 2.30%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for PDBZX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRBFX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SRBFX has underperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.
SRBFX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
PDBZX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 0.79% | 8.91% | 1.49% | 7.35% | -17.65% | 0.23% | 12.20% | 9.44% | 0.38% | 3.84% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 0.38% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRBFX and PDBZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1996 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SRBFX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.97 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRBFX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
SRBFX
PDBZX
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRBFX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.76 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 4.96 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRBFX drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRBFX and PDBZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRBFX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -20.88% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -3.00% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.28% | -5.51% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -20.81% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.97% | -20.88% | -2.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -1.62% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -2.30% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.06% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) is 1.24%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that SRBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRBFX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.93% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 3.36% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 4.31% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 6.05% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 5.38% | +0.07% |
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SRBFX and PDBZX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
SRBFX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
SRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than PDBZX's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.58% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 4.85% | 4.86% | 4.11% | 3.74% | 3.72% | 3.23% | 7.56% | 4.59% | 2.85% | 2.77% | 3.93% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SRBFX and PDBZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PDBZX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to SRBFX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRBFX dropped -24.34% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.
SRBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRBFX and PDBZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer